From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lytjen v. US BANK, NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 9, 2012
Civ. No. 11-3155-CL (D. Or. Jan. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civ. No. 11-3155-CL

01-09-2012

JANICE G. LYTJEN, Plaintiff, v. US BANK, NA, AS TRUSTEE FOR CSFB MORTGAGED-BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-7 and RECONTRUST COMPANY NA, Defendants.


TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

PANNER , J.A

Plaintiff seeks an ex parte temporary restraining order to enjoin the foreclosure sale of her house. Plaintiff alleges the house is scheduled for a foreclosure sale on January 12, 2012 and defendants have not complied with the legal requirements for a valid non-judicial foreclosure. Specifically, plaintiff alleges defendants failed to record all assignments of the trust deed in the county land records prior to initiating the foreclosure proceedings. In Oregon, a party initiating non-judicial foreclosure proceedings must record all assignments of the trust deed. ORS 8 6.735(1); Hooker v. Northwest Trustee Services, Inc., 2011 WL 2119103, *3 (D. Or. May 25) (citing Burgett v. MERS, 2010 WL 4282105, at *2 (D. Or. Oct. 20) and In re McCoy, 2011 WL 477820, at *3-4 (Bankr. D. Or. Feb. 7)). Plaintiff alleges MERS is listed as the beneficiary on the deed of trust at issue. (Compl. Ex. A, 2.)

Because of the alleged imminent foreclosure sale, and because the presence of MERS demonstrates a high probability that defendants did not comply with the recording requirements of the Oregon Trust Deed Act, I grant plaintiff's request for a temporary restraining order (#3). Defendants, and their officers, agents, etc..., and other persons in active concert or participation with defendants, who receive actual notice of this order, are restrained from conducting a foreclosure sale for the following property: 1059 Park Street, Ashland, Oregon, from this day until Monday, January 23, 2012, at 5:00 p.m. This court will hold a hearing on whether to issue a preliminary injunction at 9:00 a.m. on January 23, 2012, in the James A. Redden Courthouse in Medford.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this _ day of January, 2012, at _ clock a.m.

___________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lytjen v. US BANK, NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jan 9, 2012
Civ. No. 11-3155-CL (D. Or. Jan. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Lytjen v. US BANK, NA

Case Details

Full title:JANICE G. LYTJEN, Plaintiff, v. US BANK, NA, AS TRUSTEE FOR CSFB…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jan 9, 2012

Citations

Civ. No. 11-3155-CL (D. Or. Jan. 9, 2012)