From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 21, 1953
201 F.2d 510 (2d Cir. 1953)

Opinion

No. 161, Docket 22556.

Argued January 6, 1953.

Decided January 21, 1953. Writ of Certiorari Denied April 6, 1953. See 73 S.Ct. 781.

Copal Mintz, New York City, for appellants.

Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City (Albert R. Connelly, George S. Leonard and John G. Williams, New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and CLARK and FRANK, Circuit Judges.


The defendants in the prior state court action brought by Westinghouse raised the defense of illegality of the contract sued upon. Thereafter they brought the present action in the federal court and sought to stay further proceedings in the state court. Judge Bondy rightly held that 28 U.S.C.A. § 2283 prevents the issuance of such a stay. The appellants' attempt to distinguish Red Rock Cola Co. v. Red Rock Bottlers, 5 Cir., 195 F.2d 406, and Bascom Launder Corp. v. Telecoin Corp., D.C.S.D.N.Y., 9 F.R.D. 677 is not persuasive. We agree with those decisions.

The order is affirmed and our mandate will be issued forthwith.


Summaries of

Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Jan 21, 1953
201 F.2d 510 (2d Cir. 1953)
Case details for

Lyons v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.

Case Details

Full title:LYONS et al. v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP. et al

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Jan 21, 1953

Citations

201 F.2d 510 (2d Cir. 1953)

Citing Cases

Vernitron Corporation v. Benjamin

But, to justify an injunction of a state court action, "[i]t is not sufficient to show that the matter…

Studebaker Corporation v. Gittlin

However, the cases refusing to enjoin state proceedings under that statute have rested on the ground that the…