From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyles v. Weatherford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
No. 3:12-1304 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 20, 2012)

Opinion

No. 3:12-1304

12-20-2012

ELVIS D. LYLES, III Plaintiff, v. SONNY WEATHERFORD, et al. Defendants.


Judge Sharp


MEMORANDUM

The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, is a resident of Nashville.He brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sonny Weatherford, Sheriff of Sumner County, and Sonya Troutt, Administrator of the Sumner County Jail, seeking damages.

At the time the complaint was completed, the plaintiff was an inmate at the Sumner County Jail. By way of a telephone call to the Jail, it was confirmed that he had been released from custody on September 26, 2012.

While confined at the Sumner County Jail, the plaintiff requested some law books. He was told that the Jail did not have a law library and that the books he requested were not available. The plaintiff claims that the failure to provide him with the requested legal texts was a violation of his constitutional rights.

To state a claim for § 1983 relief, the plaintiff must plead and prove that the defendants, while acting under color of state law, deprived him of some right guaranteed by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 535 (1981).

A prisoner has a First Amendment right of access to the courts. Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 821-823 (1977). To insure the meaningful exercise of this right, jail officials are under an affirmative obligation to provide inmates with access to an adequate law library, Walker v. Mintzes, 771 F.2d 920 (6th Cir.1985), or some alternate form of legal assistance. Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396 419 (1974).

It is not enough, however, for the plaintiff to simply allege that an adequate law library or some alternate form of legal assistance has not been made available to him. He must also show that the defendants' conduct in some way prejudiced the filing or prosecution of a legal matter. Walker, supra at 771 F.2d 932; Kensu v. Haigh, 87 F.3d 172, 175 (6th Cir.1996).

In this case, the plaintiff has not alleged any type of prejudice arising from the failure to provide him with the requested legal texts. As a consequence, he has failed to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted. Having failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, the Court is obliged to dismiss the complaint sua sponte. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

An appropriate order will be entered.

________

Kevin H. Sharp

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lyles v. Weatherford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 20, 2012
No. 3:12-1304 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 20, 2012)
Case details for

Lyles v. Weatherford

Case Details

Full title:ELVIS D. LYLES, III Plaintiff, v. SONNY WEATHERFORD, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 20, 2012

Citations

No. 3:12-1304 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 20, 2012)