From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyles v. Beto

U.S.
Jan 18, 1965
379 U.S. 648 (1965)

Summary

In Lyles v. Beto, 379 U.S. 648, 85 S.Ct. 613, 13 L.Ed.2d 552 (1965), the Supreme Court remanded for consideration in the light of Massiah a case of purposeful post-indictment interrogation of an unrepresented defendant who had not been advised of his right to counsel and had not waived that right. Cf. United States v. Hindmarsh, 389 F.2d 137 (6th Cir. 1968).

Summary of this case from Pryor v. Henderson

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.

No. 263, Misc.

Decided January 18, 1965.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 329 F.2d 332.

E. D. Vickery for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.


The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201.


Summaries of

Lyles v. Beto

U.S.
Jan 18, 1965
379 U.S. 648 (1965)

In Lyles v. Beto, 379 U.S. 648, 85 S.Ct. 613, 13 L.Ed.2d 552 (1965), the Supreme Court remanded for consideration in the light of Massiah a case of purposeful post-indictment interrogation of an unrepresented defendant who had not been advised of his right to counsel and had not waived that right. Cf. United States v. Hindmarsh, 389 F.2d 137 (6th Cir. 1968).

Summary of this case from Pryor v. Henderson
Case details for

Lyles v. Beto

Case Details

Full title:LYLES v . BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 18, 1965

Citations

379 U.S. 648 (1965)

Citing Cases

White v. Hancock

The subsequent decision of the Supreme Court in Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16…

United States ex rel. Romano v. Fay

II. THE RETROACTIVITY QUESTION Petitioner argues that the Supreme Court's decision in Lyles v. Beto, 379 U.S.…