From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyle v. Redman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 11, 2023
2:22-cv-01801-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01801-TLN-DB

09-11-2023

MICHAEL WILLIAM LYLE, JR., Plaintiff, v. GARY REDMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On July 28, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff, and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 28, 2023 (ECF No.9) are ADOPTED IN FULL.
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case.


Summaries of

Lyle v. Redman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 11, 2023
2:22-cv-01801-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Lyle v. Redman

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL WILLIAM LYLE, JR., Plaintiff, v. GARY REDMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 11, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01801-TLN-DB (E.D. Cal. Sep. 11, 2023)