From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luxama v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 22, 2021
No. SC21-1426 (Fla. Dec. 22, 2021)

Opinion

SC21-1426

12-22-2021

PAUL LUXAMA Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 062005CF002281A88810

The petition for writ of prohibition is hereby denied because Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that a lower court is attempting to act in excess of its jurisdiction. See Mandico v. Taos Constr., Inc., 605 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1992); English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla. 1977). No motion for rehearing will be entertained.

POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Luxama v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Dec 22, 2021
No. SC21-1426 (Fla. Dec. 22, 2021)
Case details for

Luxama v. State

Case Details

Full title:PAUL LUXAMA Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Dec 22, 2021

Citations

No. SC21-1426 (Fla. Dec. 22, 2021)