From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lusik v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. & Parole

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
May 8, 2012
No. 33 EAP 2011 (Pa. May. 8, 2012)

Opinion

No. 33 EAP 2011

05-08-2012

DAVID LUSIK, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE; CYNTHIA DAUB, BOARD SECRETARY; MATTHEW T. MANGINO, ESQUIRE, BOARD MEMBER; ALLAN M. ROBINSON, ESQUIRE, BOARD ATTORNEY; JUDITH B. SELVEY, PAROLE STAFF TECHNICIAN; STEVEN PALM, UNLICENSED THERAPIST; DR. SIMMONS, STAFF PSYCHOLOGIST; UNIT MANAGER HEBERLING; AND ERIC D. RAY, CORRECTIONS CLASSIFICATION PROGRAM MANAGER Appellees


Appeal from the Order Entered on November 10, 2010 in the Commonwealth Court at No. 624 MD 2010


ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of May, 2012, the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED.

The request for Leave for Permission to File Application Rule 2501(a) filed April 4, 2012 and the request for Leave to File the Documents filed on April 23, 2012 are DENIED.


Summaries of

Lusik v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. & Parole

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
May 8, 2012
No. 33 EAP 2011 (Pa. May. 8, 2012)
Case details for

Lusik v. Pennsylvania Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Case Details

Full title:DAVID LUSIK, Appellant v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: May 8, 2012

Citations

No. 33 EAP 2011 (Pa. May. 8, 2012)