From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luquin v. Guerrero

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 18, 2023
22-cv-07339-SK (N.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-07339-SK

09-18-2023

JOSE O. LUQUIN, Plaintiff, v. ENRIQUE GUERRERO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

REGARDING DOCKET NO. 44

SALLIE KIM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Counsel for the parties filed a notice that the parties have memorialized and are reviewing a settlement agreement, which they expect to complete in 30 days. (Dkt. No. 44) In light of the pending settlement, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court within one hundred and twenty days, with proof of service, that the agreed consideration for settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this case shall be restored to the calendar and set for trial. If no certification is filed, after passage of one hundred and twenty days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice. The initial case management conference presently scheduled for September 25, 2023 is hereby VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Luquin v. Guerrero

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 18, 2023
22-cv-07339-SK (N.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2023)
Case details for

Luquin v. Guerrero

Case Details

Full title:JOSE O. LUQUIN, Plaintiff, v. ENRIQUE GUERRERO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 18, 2023

Citations

22-cv-07339-SK (N.D. Cal. Sep. 18, 2023)