From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lunsford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 27, 1994
637 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

No. 93-1988.

May 27, 1994.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. John's County, Richard G. Weinberg, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Nancy Ryan, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Lunsford appeals the imposition of restitution for property damage after he pled nolo contendere to one count of aggravated battery for hitting Shawn Morris with a metal pipe. Lunsford claims the trial court erred in failing to set a restitution hearing, after counsel objected to the imposition of restitution and requested that the state submit evidence to support its claim. We agree and reverse.

At the plea hearing the state requested restitution of $248 for medical bills and $2,200 for damage to the victim's car. When defense objected the judge agreed to set a restitution hearing, but none was held. Several months later, Lunsford was represented by a different attorney at the sentencing hearing. He moved for a one month continuance so Lunsford's attorney could be present. However, the trial judge denied the motion and summarily sentenced Lunsford to ten years probation, conditioned on restitution of $2,458.55.

Section 775.089(7), Florida Statutes (1991) puts the burden of demonstrating the amount of loss to be compensated for by restitution on the state. See also Bolling v. State, 631 So.2d 310 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (state has burden of proving loss); Vanlieu v. State, 630 So.2d 1218 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (if objection to amount of restitution, state must establish amount at hearing). In this case, the amount of restitution was objected to by the defendant and the trial judge assured him a hearing would be scheduled. None was ever held. Therefore, this cause must be reversed and the cause remanded to hold a restitution hearing as promised.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DIAMANTIS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lunsford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 27, 1994
637 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

Lunsford v. State

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN WARD LUNSFORD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 27, 1994

Citations

637 So. 2d 348 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1994)

Citing Cases

Oliver v. State

Oliver argues, and the State acknowledges, that the State did not meet its burden in demonstrating the amount…

Noonan v. State

When a defendant objects to restitution and requests proof by the State of the restitution amount, he is…