From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lunn v. Veterans Affairs Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 11, 2012
Civil No. 3:10-1079 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:10-1079

12-11-2012

CATHERINE SHERARD LUNN, Plaintiff, v. VETERANS AFFAIRS HOSPITAL, Defendant.


Judge Trauger

Magistrate Judge Knowles


ORDER

On November 7, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 24), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the plaintiff's "Motion to Reopen The Case" (Docket No. 23) is DENIED.

The pro se plaintiff has written a letter to the court requesting a meeting with Magistrate Judge Knowles. This request is DENIED as moot. The letter also expresses dismay at the fact that health information concerning the plaintiff appears in the docket of this case, which can be publicly accessed. It is hereby ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge shall review the record in this case and place under seal any health information concerning the plaintiff.

It is so ORDERED.

____________________________

ALETA A. TRAUGER

U.S. District Judge


Summaries of

Lunn v. Veterans Affairs Hosp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Dec 11, 2012
Civil No. 3:10-1079 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Lunn v. Veterans Affairs Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE SHERARD LUNN, Plaintiff, v. VETERANS AFFAIRS HOSPITAL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Dec 11, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 3:10-1079 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 11, 2012)