From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lundgren v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 15, 2019
266 So. 3d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18-3303

03-15-2019

James LUNDGREN, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

James Lundgren, Zephyrhills, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


James Lundgren, Zephyrhills, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the dismissal of Appellant's petition for writ of mandamus seeking records pursuant to section 119.07, Florida Statutes (2018), because Appellant's argument on appeal necessarily relies on subsequent facts that were not raised in the petition below. Our affirmance is therefore without prejudice.

AFFIRMED, without prejudice.

EDWARDS, EISNAUGLE and SASSO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lundgren v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Mar 15, 2019
266 So. 3d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Lundgren v. State

Case Details

Full title:JAMES LUNDGREN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 15, 2019

Citations

266 So. 3d 268 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2019)