From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lundblad v. Celeste

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 21, 1989
882 F.2d 207 (6th Cir. 1989)

Opinion

Nos. 87-3651, 87-3689.

July 21, 1989.

Terrence M. Fay (argued), Asst. Atty. Gen., Environmental Enforcement Sec., Columbus, Ohio, for appellants.

Jeffrey Decile (argued), James Ayers' Law Office, Columbus, Ohio, for appellees.

Before ENGEL, Chief Judge, KEITH, MERRITT, KENNEDY, MARTIN, JONES, KRUPANSKY, WELLFORD, MILBURN, GUY, NELSON, RYAN, BOGGS and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:

The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.


Summaries of

Lundblad v. Celeste

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Jul 21, 1989
882 F.2d 207 (6th Cir. 1989)
Case details for

Lundblad v. Celeste

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN LUNDBLAD, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CROSS-APPELLANT, v. RICHARD D…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Jul 21, 1989

Citations

882 F.2d 207 (6th Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Umbehr v. McClure

174, 74 L.Ed.2d 143 (1982); Ambrose v. Knotts, 865 F. Supp. 342, 345 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 17, 1994) (holding that…

Downtown Auto Parks, Inc. v. City of Milwaukee

Since Rutan was decided, the Sixth Circuit has also refused to prohibit the government from considering…