From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LUND v. PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 4, 2010
Civil No. 10-0028 (JRT/RLE) (D. Minn. May. 4, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-0028 (JRT/RLE).

May 4, 2010

John Fabian, III, FABIAN MAY ANDERSON, Minneapolis, MN, for plaintiff.

Kurt Erickson, JACKSON LEWIS LLP, Minneapolis, MN, for defendant.


ORDER


This matter came before the Court on appeal from the order of the Magistrate Judge granting plaintiff's motion to exclude certain individuals from the deposition of Chastity Lund. The Court construes plaintiff's motion to exclude witnesses from the deposition of Chastity Lund as a motion for a protective order under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1)(E). See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(c)(1) (stating that Federal Rule of Evidence 615 does not apply to deposition testimony). The Court finds that plaintiff has failed to show sufficient good cause to exclude Todd Hunter from Lund's deposition, and in that respect overrules the order of the Magistrate Judge. In all other respects, the Court affirms the Magistrate Judge's order.

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the order of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED in part and OVERRULED in part.


Summaries of

LUND v. PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
May 4, 2010
Civil No. 10-0028 (JRT/RLE) (D. Minn. May. 4, 2010)
Case details for

LUND v. PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CHASTITY LUND, Plaintiff, v. PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: May 4, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-0028 (JRT/RLE) (D. Minn. May. 4, 2010)