From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lull v. Cnty. of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 5, 2022
2:20-cv-1645-KJM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1645-KJM-CKD

04-05-2022

Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. County of Sacramento, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This matter is before the court on defendants' request for entry of judgment, ECF No. 34. In late October 2021, this court granted defendants' motion to dismiss in full and granted defendants' motion for sanctions, with the amount of sanctions to be determined once defendants filed an updated itemization of actual expenses incurred. See Order (October 29, 2021), ECF No. 29. In early January 2022, plaintiffs satisfied the sanctions award. See Notice, ECF No. 34. Upon defendants' request, the court enters judgment in the case in favor of defendants and dismisses all claims against defendants Accordingly, this case is closed

This order resolves ECF No. 34.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lull v. Cnty. of Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 5, 2022
2:20-cv-1645-KJM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Lull v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Lull and Autotek, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. County of Sacramento…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-1645-KJM-CKD (E.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2022)