Opinion
Case No. 04-75051.
September 14, 2006
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REHEARING OR RECONSIDERATION
Before the court is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, filed September 5, 2006. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the court's August 23, 2006 order denying Defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law or new trial, granting remittitur, and granting in part Plaintiff's motion for attorney fees. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(g)(2) (E.D. Mich. Sept. 8, 1998), no response was ordered and no oral argument was heard.
Generally, and without restricting the court's discretion, the court will not grant motions for rehearing or reconsideration which merely present the same issues ruled upon by the court, either expressly or by reasonable implication. The movant shall not only demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled but also show that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition of the case.
LR 7.1(g)(3).
Having filed a motion for reconsideration that presents the same issues ruled upon by the court, Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the court and the parties have been misled. Therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's September 5, 2006 motion for reconsideration is DENIED.