From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 26, 2002
833 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

Case No. 4D02-985.

Opinion filed December 26, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dorian Damoorgian, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 00-4596CF10B, 00-10312CF10A, 00-14484CF10A, and 00-21135CF10A.

Wayne Luke, Immokalee, pro se.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard Valuntas, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant entered a no contest plea to a drug possession charge on September 25, 2001. On September 26, he filed a pro se motion to withdraw his plea claiming ineffective assistance of counsel. Among the grounds alleged was the claim that appellant's trial counsel had "manipulated [him] into pleading no contest." The trial court denied the motion to vacate the plea without holding an evidentiary hearing. Based on Ventura v. State, 820 So.2d 1026 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), and Simeton v. State, 734 So.2d 446 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), we remand this case for an evidentiary hearing on appellant's motion to withdraw his plea.

SHAHOOD, GROSS, JJ., and MAASS, ELIZABETH T., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Luke v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 26, 2002
833 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Luke v. State

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE LUKE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 26, 2002

Citations

833 So. 2d 256 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)