From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lugo v. Lesbian & Gay Cmtys. Serv. Ctr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2021
21-CV-7423 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2021)

Opinion

21-CV-7423 (VSB)

09-16-2021

CARLOS LUGO, Plaintiff, v. LESBIAN & GAY COMMUNITIES SERVICES CENTER; CHRIS LaPLANT, Defendants.


ORDER OF SERVICE

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff brings this pro se action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, the New York State Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290 to 297, and the New York City Human Rights Law, N.Y.C. Admin. Code §§ 8-101 to 131, alleging that his employer discriminated against him based on his sex. By order dated September 7, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP).

Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service. Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that summonses and the complaint be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served summonses and the complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that a summons be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued. If the complaint is not served within that time, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff's responsibility to request an extension of time for service); see also Murray v. Pataki , 378 Fed.Appx. 50, 52 (2d Cir. 2010) (“As long as the [plaintiff proceeding IFP] provides the information necessary to identify the defendant, the Marshals' failure to effect service automatically constitutes ‘good cause' for an extension of time within the meaning of Rule 4(m).”).

To allow Plaintiff to effect service on defendants through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for the defendants. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon the defendants.

Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so.

CONCLUSION

The Clerk of Court is instructed to complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for Defendants Lesbian & Gay Communities Services Center and Chris LaPlant and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service.

The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, along with an information package.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lugo v. Lesbian & Gay Cmtys. Serv. Ctr.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 16, 2021
21-CV-7423 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Lugo v. Lesbian & Gay Cmtys. Serv. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS LUGO, Plaintiff, v. LESBIAN & GAY COMMUNITIES SERVICES CENTER…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 16, 2021

Citations

21-CV-7423 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 2021)