From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luftman v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 1948
273 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

March 22, 1948.

Present — Glennon, J.P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.


On the record, in view of all the unusual facts and circumstances presented, and under the statutes and regulations as they now exist, the order appealed from is proper except that the injunction should be modified in one respect. There should be added to the third decretal paragraph a provision that the defendant, Bing Bing, Inc., shall not be enjoined and restrained pendente lite from bringing, if so advised, any appropriate action or proceedings before the Federal Authorities for relief under the Federal Housing and Rent Act of 1947 ( U.S. Code, tit. 50, Appendix, § 1881 et seq.) and regulations thereunder. As so modified, the order is unanimously affirmed, without costs. Settle order on one day's notice.


Summaries of

Luftman v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 22, 1948
273 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Luftman v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:JULIUS LUFTMAN et al., Suing on Their Own Behalf and on Behalf of All…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 22, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Matter of Granville v. Ross

The Temporary City Housing Rent Commission and Bing Bing, Inc., as owners of the Hotel Marcy, West End Avenue…