Opinion
Page 1402b
185 Cal.App.4th 1402b __ Cal.Rptr.3d__ LUCKY UNITED PROPERTIES INVESTMENT, INC., et al., Cross-Complainants and Respondents, v. ALBERT LEE, Cross-Defendant and Appellant. A124965 California Court of Appeal, First District, Fifth Division June 28, 2010San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. 454503.
THE COURT:
IT IS ORDERED that the opinion filed herein on May 28, 2010, (185 Cal.App.4th 125;___Cal.Rptr.3d___), be modified as follows and the petition for rehearing is DENIED:
On page 25 [185 Cal.App.4th 150, advance report, 1st full par., line 1], the first sentence of the first full paragraph is modified by replacing “In its respondent’s brief, Lucky now morphs his” with “Nor could Lucky morph its, ” so that the sentence now reads: “Nor could Lucky morph its Civil Code section 1479 argument into a claim that it wanted to direct its payment to the principal portion of the debt arising from the August 20 Order, as opposed to the portion attributable to the interest that had accrued on the August 20 Order.”
Typographical errors will be corrected upon publication in the official reports.
The modification effects no change in the judgment.