From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luckett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 11, 2010
309 S.W.3d 875 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. ED93393.

May 11, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Warren County, Keith M. Sutherland, Judge.

Mark A. Grothoff, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Asst. Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Prior report: 267 S.W.3d 750.



ORDER


Walter L. Luckett ("Movant") appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant argues the motion court clearly erred in denying his 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief because his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call Darrel Holloway (a.k.a. Ralph Poe), whose testimony would have provided Movant with a complete defense by establishing that the drugs found by the police belonged to Holloway and that Movant did not know about the drugs.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Luckett v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
May 11, 2010
309 S.W.3d 875 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

Luckett v. State

Case Details

Full title:Walter LUCKETT, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: May 11, 2010

Citations

309 S.W.3d 875 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010)