From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Luckett v. Bayoneto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 16, 2013
No. 11-CV-11107 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 11-CV-11107

2013-09-16

STANLEY LUCKETT, Plaintiff, v. MARIO BAYONETO and JOHN UPP, Defendants.


Hon. Gerald E. Rosen


JUDGMENT

The Court having this date entered an Order adopting the Magistrate Judge's July 15, 2013 Report and Recommendation and dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint, in its entirety, with prejudice,

NOW, THEREFORE,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that a JUDGMENT of DISMISSAL, WITH PREJUDICE, be, and hereby is, entered.

Gerald E. Rosen

Chief Judge, United States District Court
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties and/or counsel of record on September 16, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Julie Owens

Case Manager, (313) 234-5135


Summaries of

Luckett v. Bayoneto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 16, 2013
No. 11-CV-11107 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2013)
Case details for

Luckett v. Bayoneto

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY LUCKETT, Plaintiff, v. MARIO BAYONETO and JOHN UPP, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 16, 2013

Citations

No. 11-CV-11107 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 16, 2013)

Citing Cases

Harris v. Sanborn

Id. Courts in this district regularly dismiss complaints lodged by pro se plaintiffs who fail to abide by…

Echols v. Wingate Mgmt., Inc.

Id. Courts in this district regularly dismiss complaints lodged by pro se plaintiffs who fail to abide by…