From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucio v. Smith

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Jan 3, 2013
1:08-cv-00631 WHA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013)

Opinion

          KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672, Attorney General of California, DAVID A. CARRASCO, State Bar No. 160460, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, JON S. ALLIN, State Bar No. 155069, Deputy Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, E-mail: Jon.Allin@doj.ca.gov, Attorneys for Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kuykendall, Garbutt, and Park.

          JACKSON & LEWIS DAVID JOHANSON, Attorneys for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

          WILLIAM H. ALSUP, District Judge.

         The parties, by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate to an extension of the deadline for Defendants California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Kuykendall, Garbutt, and Park to respond to the complaint, to and including January 22, 2013.

         IT IS SO ORDERED:


Summaries of

Lucio v. Smith

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Jan 3, 2013
1:08-cv-00631 WHA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013)
Case details for

Lucio v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR LUCIO, Plaintiff, v. J.A. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Fresno Division

Date published: Jan 3, 2013

Citations

1:08-cv-00631 WHA (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2013)