From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucas v. Reese

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 4, 2012
Case No. 1:10-cv-00699-SLB-HGD (N.D. Ala. Sep. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 1:10-cv-00699-SLB-HGD

09-04-2012

ROY LUCAS, Plaintiff v. CONSTANCE REESE, et al., Defendants


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

The magistrate judge filed a report and recommendation on April 5, 2012, recommending that this action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 16). No objections were filed.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be and is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Accordingly, the complaint is due to be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. A Final Judgment will be entered.

________________________

SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lucas v. Reese

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION
Sep 4, 2012
Case No. 1:10-cv-00699-SLB-HGD (N.D. Ala. Sep. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Lucas v. Reese

Case Details

Full title:ROY LUCAS, Plaintiff v. CONSTANCE REESE, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 4, 2012

Citations

Case No. 1:10-cv-00699-SLB-HGD (N.D. Ala. Sep. 4, 2012)