From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lucas v. Office of Mental Health

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 9, 2020
20-CV-7325 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 9, 2020)

Opinion

20-CV-7325 (CM)

09-09-2020

TROY LUCAS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent.


ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION :

Petitioner, proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus. To proceed with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court, a petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or, to request authorization to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), that is, without prepayment of fees, submit a signed IFP application. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915.

Petitioner submitted an IFP application with the petition, but the IFP application is unsigned and incomplete. Within thirty days of the date of this order, Petitioner must either pay the $5.00 filing fee or fully complete and sign the attached amended IFP application, and submit it. If Petitioner submits the amended IFP application, it should be labeled with docket number 20-CV-7325. If the Court grants the IFP application, Petitioner will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and note service on the docket. No answer shall be required at this time. If Petitioner complies with this order, the case shall be processed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If Petitioner fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that appellant demonstrates good faith when seeking review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 9, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

COLLEEN McMAHON

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lucas v. Office of Mental Health

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Sep 9, 2020
20-CV-7325 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Lucas v. Office of Mental Health

Case Details

Full title:TROY LUCAS, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Sep 9, 2020

Citations

20-CV-7325 (CM) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 9, 2020)