Summary
accepting magistrate judge's recommendation and denying Younger abstention-based remand motion because the plaintiff had not raised any constitutional challenges
Summary of this case from Wrolstad v. Selene Fin. L.P.Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-CV-1057-G (BH)
12-16-2013
JAY LUCAS, Plaintiff, v. OCWEN HOME LOAN SERVICING, ET AL., Defendants.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
After reviewing all relevant matters of record in this case, including the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge and any objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned district judge is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge dated November 5, 2013 (docket entry 16) are correct, and they are accepted as the findings and conclusions of the court.
Accordingly, by separate judgment, defendants Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Reconstruct, and Federal National Mortgage Association will be sua sponte DISMISSED as improperly joined defendants.
SO ORDERED.
___________________
A. JOE FISH
Senior United States District Judge