From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LUBBOCK REG MENTAL v. McMENAMY

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
May 14, 2004
No. 07-03-0174-CV (Tex. App. May. 14, 2004)

Opinion

No. 07-03-0174-CV.

May 14, 2004.

Appeal from the 99th District Court of Lubbock County, No. 2002-518,541, Honorable Billy John Edwards, Judge.

Panel A: Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Lubbock Regional Mental Health and Mental Retardation Center (MHMR) appeals from a partial denial of its plea to the jurisdiction. We reverse.

Patty McMenamy (McMenamy), individually and as next friend of Jeff McMenamy, filed suit against MHMR alleging ordinary negligence and a violation of the Patient's Bill of Rights, Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. §§ 321.001-.004 (Vernon 2001), for injuries that Jeff suffered while attending a program offered by appellant.

Further references to Texas Health and Safety Code provisions will be by reference to "THSC § ___."

MHMR filed a Plea to the Jurisdiction urging that McMenamy's claims were barred by sovereign immunity. As relevant to this appeal, MHMR contended that the Patient's Bill of Rights does not expressly or impliedly waive sovereign immunity.

See Federal Sign v. Tex. S. Univ., 951 S.W.2d 401, 405 (Tex. 1997); Lowe v. Tex. Tech Univ., 540 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Tex. 1976).

McMenamy did not contest MHMR's proof of its status as a community center organized under provisions of the Texas Mental Health/Mental Retardation Act of 1965, see Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 5547-201 through 204, codified as THSC ch. 534, and its entitlement to sovereign immunity, absent a waiver of that immunity. See THSC § 534.001(c)(1);Dallas County Mental Health and Mental Retardation v. Bossley, 968 S.W.2d 339 (Tex. 1998).

The trial court granted MHMR's plea in regard to the ordinary negligence claim, resulting in the dismissal of the claim for want of jurisdiction, but denied MHMR's plea in regard to the Patient's Bill of Rights claim. MHMR appealed the failure of the trial court to dismiss the Patient Bill of Rights claim. See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(8) (Vernon Supp. 2003).

On July 10, 2003, McMenamy filed notice of appeal challenging the trial court's dismissal of her ordinary negligence claim for lack of jurisdiction. The trial court's order was dated March 31, 2003. McMenamy's notice of appeal was not timely filed. See Tex.R.App.P. 26.1(b), (d) and 28. McMenamy did not file a brief in support of her attempted appeal of the trial court's dismissal of her ordinary negligence claim. We dismiss McMenamy's appeal. Tex.R.App.P. 25.1(b) and 38.8(a)(1).

The Texas Supreme Court has now determined that there is neither an express nor implied waiver of sovereign immunity in the Patient's Bill of Rights and, therefore, state mental health facilities such as MHMR are immune from suit for violations of THSC § 321.001-.004. See Wichita Falls State Hosp. v. Taylor, 106 S.W.3d 692 (Tex. 2003).

Because sovereign immunity protects MHMR from suit for violations of the Patient's Bill of Rights provisions, the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction over McMenamy's Patient's Bill of Rights claim. We reverse that part of the trial court's order denying MHMR's plea to the jurisdiction, render judgment dismissing McMenamy's Patient's Bill of Rights claim for want of jurisdiction, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.


Summaries of

LUBBOCK REG MENTAL v. McMENAMY

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo
May 14, 2004
No. 07-03-0174-CV (Tex. App. May. 14, 2004)
Case details for

LUBBOCK REG MENTAL v. McMENAMY

Case Details

Full title:LUBBOCK REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL RETARDATION CENTER, Appellant v…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo

Date published: May 14, 2004

Citations

No. 07-03-0174-CV (Tex. App. May. 14, 2004)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. Lubbock Reg'l MHMR

MHMR asserts it is subject to the Political Subdivisions Law, Chapter 504 of the Labor Code, which concerns…