From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lu v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 6, 2022
2:22-cv-06899-RGK-AGRx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-06899-RGK-AGRx

12-06-2022

Zuoci Lu v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, et al.


PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION

HONORABLE R. GARY KLAUSNER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 4(m). Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service (60 days if the defendant is the United States). Fed.R.Civ.Proc. 12(a)(1).

In the present case, it appears that one or more of these time periods has not been met. Accordingly, the court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing by December 13, 2022, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to certain defendant/s.

Alternatively, the Court will consider the following a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause:

Alternative Response

Response Due Date

As to Defendant/s:

Proof of timely service of summons and operative complaint

X

Response to the operative Complaint

12/9/2022

Alejandro N. Mayorkas Ur M. Jaddou David M. Radel

X

If defendant fails to respond on the date above, Plaintiff's application for entry of default by clerk pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

12/13/2022

Alejandro N. Mayorkas Ur M. Jaddou David M. Radel

Plaintiff's motion for default judgment pursuant to Rule 55b of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

If a satisfactory response is not timely filed, the matter or the listed defendants will be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A satisfactory response does not include any request to extend time.

Pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument.

Plaintiff to serve this order on any non-appearing defendant/s.


Summaries of

Lu v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 6, 2022
2:22-cv-06899-RGK-AGRx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2022)
Case details for

Lu v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:Zuoci Lu v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, et al.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 6, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-06899-RGK-AGRx (C.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2022)