From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loza v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2014
No. CV 13-2556 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2014)

Opinion

No. CV 13-2556 MWF (FFM)

03-26-2014

ADAM LOZA, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice as time-barred.

________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Loza v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 26, 2014
No. CV 13-2556 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2014)
Case details for

Loza v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:ADAM LOZA, Petitioner, v. J. SOTO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 26, 2014

Citations

No. CV 13-2556 MWF (FFM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 26, 2014)

Citing Cases

Vasquez v. Valenzuela

unfamiliarity is due to illiteracy or any other reason"); Beltran v. Foulk, 2015 WL 1268322, at *3 (C.D.…

Raja v. Sherman

Although the Ninth Circuit has recognized that "where an attorney's misconduct is sufficiently egregious it…