From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowell v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1996
234 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

December 17, 1996.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered on or about March 21, 1995, which set aside a verdict apportioning liability equally between the parties and awarding damages, and directed a new trial on liability and damages, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Before: Rosenberger, J.P., Ellerin, Rubin and Tom, JJ.


Upon review of the record, we are persuaded that the egregious misconduct of defense counsel precluded the jury from considering closely contested issues "`in the calm and untrammelled spirit necessary to effect justice'"( Schaffer v Kurpis, 177 AD2d 379, 380, quoting Kamen Soap Prods. Co. v Prusansky Prusansky, 11 AD2d 676), and otherwise deprived plaintiff of a fair trial.


Summaries of

Lowell v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1996
234 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Lowell v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT LOWELL, Respondent, v. MANHATTAN AND BRONX SURFACE TRANSIT OPERATING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1996

Citations

234 A.D.2d 151 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
651 N.Y.S.2d 303