From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowe v. NewQuest, LLC

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
May 27, 2022
8:21-cv-2320-TPB-JSS (M.D. Fla. May. 27, 2022)

Opinion

8:21-cv-2320-TPB-JSS

05-27-2022

ELIZABETH LOWE, Plaintiff, v. NEWQUEST, LLC and CIGNA CORPORATION, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

TOM BARBER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

This matter is before the Court on consideration of the report and recommendation of Julie S. Sneed, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on May 11, 2022. (Doc. 19). Judge Sneed recommends the “Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement and to Dismiss this Action with Prejudice” (Doc. 14) be granted. No objection to the report and recommendation was filed, and the time to object has expired.

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject, or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). A district court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which an objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). When no objection is filed, a court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. Macort v. Prem, Inc., 208 Fed.Appx. 781, 784 (11th Cir. 2006); Nettles v. Wainwright, 677 F.2d 404, 409 (5th Cir. 1982).

Upon due consideration of the record, including Judge Sneed's report and recommendation, in conjunction with an independent examination of the file, the Court adopts the report and recommendation in all respects. The Court agrees with Judge Sneed's detailed and well-reasoned factual findings and legal conclusions.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

1. The report and recommendation (Doc. 19) is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED and INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review.

2. The “Joint Motion to Approve FLSA Settlement and to Dismiss this Action with Prejudice” (Doc. 14) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART to the extent stated in the report and recommendation.

3. The Settlement Agreement and Release (Doc. 14-1) is APPROVED, with the exception of the general release (section 5(a)), individual remedies release (section 5(c)), class action waiver (section 5(d)), and non-disparagement clause (section 6(i)).

4. The general release, individual remedies release, class action waiver, and nondisparagement clause of the Settlement Agreement are STRICKEN.

5. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

6. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lowe v. NewQuest, LLC

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
May 27, 2022
8:21-cv-2320-TPB-JSS (M.D. Fla. May. 27, 2022)
Case details for

Lowe v. NewQuest, LLC

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH LOWE, Plaintiff, v. NEWQUEST, LLC and CIGNA CORPORATION…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: May 27, 2022

Citations

8:21-cv-2320-TPB-JSS (M.D. Fla. May. 27, 2022)

Citing Cases

Long v. Ravago Am's, LLC

See Weldon v. Backwoods Steakhouse, Inc., No. 6:14-cv-00079-Orl-37TBS, 2014 WL 4385593, at *1, 4 (M.D. Fla.…