Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Lowe v. Lowe

293 S.W. 915 (Tex. Civ. App. 1927)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Lowe v. Lowe

3 Citing cases

  1. Silver v. McCamey

    221 F.2d 873 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 38 times
    In Silver, the court held that subjecting a cab driver, charged with rape, to an administrative hearing before his trial violated his due process rights in that "[h]is necessary defense in the administrative hearing may disclose his evidence long in advance of his criminal trial and prejudice his defense in that trial."

    I would reverse on principle and authority. Poston v. Home Ins. Co., 1939, 191 S.C. 314, 4 S.E.2d 261, 123 A.L.R. 1451; State v. Schauenberg, 1924, 197 Iowa 445, 197 N.W. 295; Lowe v. Lowe, Tex.Civ.App., 1927, 293 S.W. 915; Application of Sheehan, 1943, 182 Misc. 57, 43 N.Y.S.2d 778.

  2. Ferguson v. Ferguson

    11 S.W.2d 214 (Tex. Civ. App. 1928)   Cited 7 times

    It was therefore addressed to the sound discretion of the court. Concerning such character of motion, it was stated by this court in Lowe v. Lowe, 293 S.W. 915: "Under the rule, well recognized in the decisions of this state, this court must sustain the action of the trial court, `unless a very clear abuse of discretion is shown.'

  3. National Freight, Inc. v. Ostroff

    133 N.J. Super. 554 (Law Div. 1975)   Cited 15 times
    In National Freight, Inc. v. Ostroff, 133 N.J. Super. 554 (Law Div. 1975), the Superior Court denied defendant's motion for stay.

    His motion was denied. Other cases with similar results are Poston v. Home Insurance Co. of New York, 191 S.C. 314, 4 S.E.2d 261 (Sup.Ct. 1939), Lowe v. Lowe, 293 S.W. 915 (Tex.Civ.App. 1927), and Fagan v. Powell, 237 So.2d 579 (Fla.App. 1970). In DeVita v. Sills, 422 F.2d 1172 (3 Cir. 1970), plaintiff, a member of the New Jersey Bar and a judge of the Union County District Court, sought to restrain a state judicial inquiry looking toward the attorney's disbarment and removal from judicial office.