From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Love v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 8, 1915
149 P. 1135 (Okla. 1915)

Opinion

No. 4736

Opinion Filed June 8, 1915.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Brief — Failure to File — Effect. Where plaintiff in error has filed no brief, as required by rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix), the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.

(Syllabus by Bleakmore, C.)

Error from District Court, Kingfisher County; J. W. Steen, Judge.

Action between Charles A. Love and Clyde Smith. From the judgment, Love brings error. Affirmed.

Giddings Giddings, for plaintiff in error.

Hinch Bradley and W. A. McCartney, for defendant in error.


The petition in error and the transcript of the record in this case was filed in this court on January 16, 1913; neither party has filed a brief, nor have they offered any excuse for the failure to do so. It is evident that the proceedings have been abandoned.

The judgment of the trial court should therefore be affirmed, under rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 137 Pac. ix). Nicholson v. Barnes, 42 Okla. 250, 140 P. 1155.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Love v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Jun 8, 1915
149 P. 1135 (Okla. 1915)
Case details for

Love v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:LOVE v. SMITH

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: Jun 8, 1915

Citations

149 P. 1135 (Okla. 1915)
149 P. 1135