From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Louisville Nashville Railroad Company v. Combs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Dec 10, 1926
289 S.W. 1091 (Ky. Ct. App. 1926)

Summary

In Huddleston v. Ashland, 217 Ky. 453, 289 S.W. 1091, the city first constructed a driveway 24 feet wide in the center of the street.

Summary of this case from Reed v. City of Paducah

Opinion

Decided December 10, 1926.

Appeal from Perry Circuit Court.

ASHBY M. WARREN, W.A. NORTHCUTT, and WOODWARD WARFIELD, JESSE MORGAN, and C.S. LANDRUM for appellant.

BAILEY P. WOOTTON and WOOTTON, SMITH WOOTON for appellee.


Reversing.

The facts of this record present the same legal questions that were involved in the case of the same appellant v. J.P. Brashear, et al., this day decided, and it is unnecessary for us in disposing of this appeal to reiterate the facts, repeat our discussion of them or restate the conclusions reached.

The opinion therein is conclusive herein, and for the same reasons the judgment is reversed with the same directions given in that opinion.


Summaries of

Louisville Nashville Railroad Company v. Combs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Dec 10, 1926
289 S.W. 1091 (Ky. Ct. App. 1926)

In Huddleston v. Ashland, 217 Ky. 453, 289 S.W. 1091, the city first constructed a driveway 24 feet wide in the center of the street.

Summary of this case from Reed v. City of Paducah
Case details for

Louisville Nashville Railroad Company v. Combs

Case Details

Full title:Louisville Nashville Railroad Company v. Combs

Court:Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Date published: Dec 10, 1926

Citations

289 S.W. 1091 (Ky. Ct. App. 1926)
217 Ky. 452

Citing Cases

Reed v. City of Paducah

The ordinance was sustained upon the ground that it rested within the discretion of the city authorities to…

The Germain Fruit Co. v. California Southern R. Co.

The defendant contracted to deliver the freight in Chicago. (Colfax Fruit Co. v. Southern Pacific Co., 118…