From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loughridge v. Allen

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jun 14, 1994
25 F.3d 1057 (10th Cir. 1994)

Summary

In Justus v. Maynard, the Tenth Circuit again analyzed a claim of one of the prisoners that was a plaintiff in Longstreth to decide whether the individual defendants were entitled to qualified immunity—the exact issue here.

Summary of this case from Stewart v. Beach

Opinion

93-5099.

June 14, 1994.

Appeal from N.D.Okl.


Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

Loughridge v. Allen

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Jun 14, 1994
25 F.3d 1057 (10th Cir. 1994)

In Justus v. Maynard, the Tenth Circuit again analyzed a claim of one of the prisoners that was a plaintiff in Longstreth to decide whether the individual defendants were entitled to qualified immunity—the exact issue here.

Summary of this case from Stewart v. Beach

stating that defining the right at issue as "an inmate's general right to religious freedom within the constraints of a prison system" was too broad

Summary of this case from Stewart v. Beach
Case details for

Loughridge v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:Loughridge v. Allen

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit

Date published: Jun 14, 1994

Citations

25 F.3d 1057 (10th Cir. 1994)

Citing Cases

Stewart v. Beach

Thus, defining the right as the freedom to practice religion in prison is too broad to "help in determining…

Harmon v. Colvin

The ALJ's decision "is not capable of meaningful review because it is internally inconsistent and…