From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lou v. Accenture United States Grp. Health Plan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 26, 2024
22-cv-03091-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2024)

Opinion

22-cv-03091-HSG

01-26-2024

ALBERT B. LOU, Plaintiff, v. ACCENTURE UNITED STATES GROUP HEALTH PLAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DIRECTING SUPPLEMENTAL FILINGS AND SETTING A FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

RE: DKT. NO. 69

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Along with its motion for summary judgment, Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield Illinois (“BCBSIL”) filed thirty-three attachments containing the underlying administrative record in this case, which is more than ten thousand pages long. See Dkt. Nos. 69-3-69-35. Despite the size of the record (and the fact that it is not searchable), BCBSIL has not provided an index, which makes it unmanageable for the Court to locate the parties' citations. By February 2, 2024, BCBSIL is DIRECTED to file an index specifying the document title and administrative record page range for each docket entry containing the administrative record, in the following format:

Dkt. No.

Document Title

AR Page Range

69-3

Admin Record 1 of 33

R1-R264

Etc.

By that date, BCBSIL is also DIRECTED to file a table of contents identifying the administrative record page numbers and ECF page numbers for all: benefit determination letters, first level appeals, first level appeal determination letters, second level appeals, and second level appeal determination letters (along with all supporting documentation, such as Letters of Medical

Necessity or reviewing doctors' notes for each). The table of contents should proceed chronologically, presenting older material first. For example:

The record contains, in many cases, numerous copies of a single document. The Court does not need the coordinates for every copy of a given document, but rather, would like the parties to identify a single copy of each relevant document. With this directive, the Court does not invite the parties to use the table of contents as a vehicle to raise arguments about the completeness of the administrative record, as the Court is already familiar with the parties' views on the subject.

Document Type

AR Page #(s)

ECF Page #(s)

Supporting/Related Materials located at [AR Page #s/ECF Page #s]

June 14, 2019 Benefit Denial Letter

R147-150

Dkt. No. 69-3 at 147-150

[ -- ]

Etc.

Before being filed on the docket, BCBSIL must confer with Plaintiff's counsel to ensure that the parties agree that its proposed table of contents is accurate and complete, and must certify in the filed document that the parties met and conferred as directed to reach consensus on its contents.

Finally, the Courts SETS a telephonic case management conference on January 30, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. All counsel shall use the following dial-in information to access the call:

Dial-In: 888-808-6929;
Passcode: 6064255

All attorneys and pro se litigants appearing for a telephonic case management conference are required to dial in at least 15 minutes before the hearing to check in with the courtroom deputy. For call clarity, parties shall NOT use speaker phone or earpieces for these calls, and where at all possible, parties shall use landlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lou v. Accenture United States Grp. Health Plan

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 26, 2024
22-cv-03091-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Lou v. Accenture United States Grp. Health Plan

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT B. LOU, Plaintiff, v. ACCENTURE UNITED STATES GROUP HEALTH PLAN, et…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 26, 2024

Citations

22-cv-03091-HSG (N.D. Cal. Jan. 26, 2024)