This district has repeatedly reaffirmed this use of circumstantial evidence. See Clayton L. v. Commissioner, 2018 WL 3090197 (D. Or. June 21, 2018) (the court remanded for an immediate award of benefits where plaintiff reported difficulties in concentration, memory, and learning new tasks; could read and do math at a middle school level; was enrolled in special education classes starting in the seventh grade; did course work at various community colleges but did not graduate because it was too difficult; failed many classes; and worked in mostly unskilled positions but also obtained a nurse's assistant certification through a job corps program); Neiss v. Berryhill, 2018 WL 1609262 (D. Or. Apr. 2, 2018) (the court remanded for an immediate award of benefits where plaintiff was enrolled in special education classes for most of her life and held back in the eighth grade; never got her driver's license because she repeatedly failed the written test; and had a history of low-skilled and sporadic work). While a plaintiff may use enrollment in special education classes to show that his or her adaptive functioning deficits onset before t