From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lorenzana v. Crow

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 24, 2015
2:15-cv-0821 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)

Opinion


ADRIAN LORENZANA, Plaintiff, v. T. CROW, Defendant. No. 2:15-cv-0821 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 24, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed May 4, 2015, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court's order.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

Lorenzana v. Crow

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 24, 2015
2:15-cv-0821 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)
Case details for

Lorenzana v. Crow

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN LORENZANA, Plaintiff, v. T. CROW, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 24, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-0821 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 24, 2015)