From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lord Construction v. Edison Portland Cement

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1919
189 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Opinion

October, 1919.


The order for examination is entirely too sweeping. The plaintiff is entitled to examine only as to the allegations of the complaint as limited by the bill of particulars. Moreover, the affidavit upon which the order for examination was obtained fails to set forth the facts required by subdivision 1 of section 872 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The order denying the motion to vacate should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to vacate granted, with ten dollars costs. Clarke, P.J., Dowling, Page and Merrell, JJ., concurred. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Motion to dismiss appeal from order of August 27, 1919, granted, with ten dollars costs.


Summaries of

Lord Construction v. Edison Portland Cement

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 1, 1919
189 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)
Case details for

Lord Construction v. Edison Portland Cement

Case Details

Full title:LORD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Respondent, v . EDISON PORTLAND CEMENT COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1919

Citations

189 App. Div. 886 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)