From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 20, 2004
366 F.3d 430 (6th Cir. 2004)

Opinion

No. 01-3875.

April 20, 2004.

Robert D. Little, Law Office of Robert Little, Maplewood, NJ, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Douglas R. Cole, Office of the Attorney General of Ohio, Columbus, OH, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; MARTIN, BATCHELDER, DAUGHTREY, MOORE, COLE, CLAY, GILMAN, GIBBONS, ROGERS, and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.

Judge Cook did not participate in this case.


A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service qualified to participate have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 35(a) provides as follows:

"The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket sheet as a pending appeal."

Accordingly, it is ORDERED, that the previous decision and judgment of this court is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.

It is further ORDERED that the appellant file a supplemental brief not later than Thursday, May 20, 2004, and the appellee file a supplemental brief not later than Monday, June 21, 2004. The Clerk will schedule this case for oral argument as directed by the court.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Wilson

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 20, 2004
366 F.3d 430 (6th Cir. 2004)
Case details for

Lopez v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:Fernando LOPEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Julius WILSON, Warden…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 20, 2004

Citations

366 F.3d 430 (6th Cir. 2004)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Bagley

Subsequently, the court voted to vacate Lopez and hear the matter en banc. Lopez v. Wilson, No. 01-3875, 2004…

Richey v. Mitchell

Although our decision in Lopez v. Wilson, 355 F.3d 931, 937-38 (6th Cir. 2004), cast doubt on whether White's…