From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Sanchez

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Oct 19, 2023
Civil Action 9:22-cv-79 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 19, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 9:22-cv-79

10-19-2023

TYLER LOPEZ v. GARY SANCHEZ, ET AL.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

CHRISTINE L. STETSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Tyler Lopez, proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights lawsuit. This matter was referred to the undersigned magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 for conclusions of law, and recommendations for the disposition of the case.

Plaintiff has filed a motion requesting a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order. (Doc. #14.) At the time Plaintiff filed his Complaint and his Motion, he was incarcerated at the Angelina County Jail. He subsequently notified the court that he has been released from confinement. (Doc. # 20.)

A release from confinement renders a claim for injunctive relief based on conditions at a litigant's former correctional facility moot. Herman v. Holiday, 238 F.3d 660, 665 (5th Cir. 2001). As Plaintiff was released after he filed his Motion, his request for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order should be denied as moot.

Recommendation

Plaintiff's motion requesting a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order should be denied as moot.

Objections

Within 14 days after receipt of the magistrate judge's report, any party may serve and file written objections to the findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations of the magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C).

Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings of facts, conclusions of law and recommendations contained herein within 14 days after service shall bar an aggrieved party from de novo review by the district court of the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations and from appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court except on grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1429 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FED. R. CIV. P. 72.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Sanchez

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division
Oct 19, 2023
Civil Action 9:22-cv-79 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Lopez v. Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:TYLER LOPEZ v. GARY SANCHEZ, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Lufkin Division

Date published: Oct 19, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 9:22-cv-79 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 19, 2023)