From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Rosenblatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 6, 1990
164 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

August 6, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Miller, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the defendant is awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

It cannot be said that the jury's conclusion that the defendant was not negligent could not have been reached upon any fair interpretation of the evidence (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134). The jury could reasonably credit the defendant's testimony that she stopped at a stop sign at the intersection where the accident occurred and conclude that she was free of any negligence. Lawrence, J.P., Kunzeman, Eiber and Harwood, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Rosenblatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 6, 1990
164 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

Lopez v. Rosenblatt

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS E. LOPEZ, Appellant, v. DEBORAH H. ROSENBLATT, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 6, 1990

Citations

164 A.D.2d 859 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
559 N.Y.S.2d 365

Citing Cases

Patti v. Fenimore

The jury could properly infer from the location of the damage to the two cars and from the fact that the…