Opinion
July 5, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.).
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the plaintiff's notice of claim, when considered under the circumstances of this case and viewed in conjunction with the pleadings and other evidence (see, D'Alessandro v. New York City Tr. Auth., 83 N.Y.2d 891), was sufficiently specific regarding the manner and location of the decedent's accident. Accordingly, we discern no improvident exercise of discretion in the Supreme Court's denial of the defendant's motion to strike certain allegations from the amended verified complaint and bill of particulars. Sullivan, J.P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.