From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 29, 2012
1:11-CV-3096-PA (D. Or. Aug. 29, 2012)

Opinion

1:11-CV-3096-PA

08-29-2012

EDUARDO LOPEZ, an individual, Plaintiff, v. JUAN FLORES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

PANNER, District Judge:

Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation, and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Although no objections have been filed, this court reviews the legal principles de novo. See Lorin Corp. v Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1983).

I have given this matter de novo review. I find no error in the Report and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

Magistrate Judge Clarke's Report and Recommendation (#73) is adopted. As noted in the Report and Recommendation, defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

OWEN M. PANNER

U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lopez v. Flores

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Aug 29, 2012
1:11-CV-3096-PA (D. Or. Aug. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Lopez v. Flores

Case Details

Full title:EDUARDO LOPEZ, an individual, Plaintiff, v. JUAN FLORES, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Citations

1:11-CV-3096-PA (D. Or. Aug. 29, 2012)