From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Falor

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 8, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-43 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 8, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-43.

November 8, 2006


ORDER


The above captioned case was referred to United States Magistrate Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32), filed on October 2, 2006, recommended that the Plaintiff's Immediate Injunction Motion (Doc. No. 19) be denied. All parties were served with the Report and Recommendation and were advised they were allowed ten (10) days from the date of service to file written objections. No objections have been filed. After review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the report and recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 8th day of November, 2006;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Plaintiff's Immediate Injunction Motion (Doc. No. 19) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 32) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated October 2, 2006, is adopted as the opinion of the court.


Summaries of

Lopez v. Falor

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 8, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-43 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 8, 2006)
Case details for

Lopez v. Falor

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. DR. STANLEY FALOR, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 8, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-43 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 8, 2006)

Citing Cases

Jankowski v. Demand

The defendant must be both aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial harm…