Lopez v. Ducart

Full title: FELIX LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. CLARK E. DUCART, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 22, 2015

2:15-cv-1237 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 22, 2015)

Opinion

FELIX LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. CLARK E. DUCART, Respondent. No. 2:15-cv-1237 KJN P United States District Court, E.D. California. June 22, 2015

          ORDER

          KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not paid the filing fee or submitted a request to proceed in forma pauperis. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Stanislaus County Superior Court. Stanislaus County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d).

         Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

         Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

         1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

         2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at: