From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopez v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 25, 2020
18 CIVIL 12201 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2020)

Opinion

18 CIVIL 12201 (JGK)

03-25-2020

JORGE LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Defendant.


JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons set forth in the Court's Order dated March 24, 2020, Magistrate Judge Lehrburger's Report and Recommendation dated March 2, 2020, is adopted, no objections have been filed and the time for filing objections has passed, therefore, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and the plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is denied; judgment is entered in favor of the Commissioner and this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York

March 25, 2020

RUBY J. KRAJICK

Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ _________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Lopez v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 25, 2020
18 CIVIL 12201 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2020)
Case details for

Lopez v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:JORGE LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. NANCY BERRYHILL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 25, 2020

Citations

18 CIVIL 12201 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2020)

Citing Cases

Mahmud v. Saul

Failure to provide an express rationale at Step Three requires remand only when a reviewing court is "unable…

Colón v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

P, App. 1, § 1.02. Because the regulations do not define "gross anatomical deformity," Lopez v. Berryhill,…