Lopez v. Antojitos Catrachos, Inc.

Full title: MARLIN LOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. ANTOJITOS CATRACHOS, INC., et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, S.D. Florida

Date published: Oct 27, 2010

CASE NO. 10-23145-CIV-HUCK/O'SULLIVAN (S.D. Fla. Oct. 27, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10-23145-CIV-HUCK/O'SULLIVAN.

October 27, 2010

ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CASE BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE

JOHN O'SULLIVAN, Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER came before the Court following a settlement conference before the undersigned and the Court having conducted a hearing concerning the settlement.

THE COURT has heard from counsel and considered the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the pertinent portions of the record, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises.

This case involves claims for minimum wage and unpaid overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201,et seq ("FLSA"). In reviewing a settlement of an FLSA private claim, a court must "scrutiniz[e] the settlement for fairness," and determine that the settlement is a "fair and reasonable resolution of a bona fide dispute over FLSA provisions." Lynn Food Stores v. United States, 679 F.2d 1350, 1352-53 (11th Cir. 1982). A settlement entered into in an adversarial context where both sides are represented by counsel throughout litigation "is more likely to reflect a reasonable compromise of disputed issues." Id. The district court may approve the settlement in order to promote the policy of encouraging settlement of litigation. Id. at 1354.

In this case, there is a factual dispute concerning the number of hours worked by the plaintiff and a legal dispute about whether the defendant is subject to enterprise coverage. The Court has reviewed the terms of the Settlement Agreement including the amount to be received by the plaintiff and the attorney's fees and costs to be received by counsel and finds that the compromise reached by the parties is a fair and reasonable resolution of the parties' bona fide disputes. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the parties' Settlement Agreement (including attorney's fees and costs) is hereby APPROVED. It is further

RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed with prejudice and that the Court retain jurisdiction until Monday, March 28, 2011 to enforce the terms of the settlement. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami, Florida this 27th day of October, 2010.