Opinion
20-CV-1013 JLS (MDD)
08-23-2021
SHEYLA KEREN LOPEZ-CASTILLO, Plaintiff, v. MARK A. MORGAN, in his official capacity as Commissioner of United States Customs and B Protection; TWO UNKNOWN UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION AGENTS, in their individual and official capacities; TWO UNKNOWN UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SUPERVISING AGENTS, in their individual and official capacities; TWO UNKNOWN IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT AND BORDER PROTECTION AGENTS, in their individual and official capacities; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO JULY 21, 2021 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
(ECF NO. 16)
HON. JANIS L. SAMMARTINO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
On November 2, 2020, Plaintiff Sheyla Keren Lopez-Castillo filed her First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned action. See ECF No. 14. Plaintiff has neither appeared nor participated in this action since that date. See generally Docket. Accordingly, on July 21, 2021, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and Civil Local Rule 41.1(a). See ECF No. 16 (“OSC”). Per the OSC, the Court provided explicit “notice to Plaintiff that if she fails to respond within thirty (30) days of the date on which this Order is electronically docketed, the Court WILL DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE this action sua sponte.” Id. at 2 (emphases in original). Although more than thirty days have elapsed since the issuance of the OSC, Plaintiff has failed to respond thereto. See generally Docket.
Accordingly, good cause appearing, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. As this concludes the litigation in this matter, the Clerk of the Court SHALL CLOSE the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.