From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lopes v. Newsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2018
Case No. 3:17-cv-07369-WHO (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-07369-WHO

03-12-2018

CORNELIUS LOPES, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Re: Dkt. No. 9

I have reviewed Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu's February 9, 2018 report and recommendation that pro se plaintiff Cornelius Lopes's complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 9. Mr. Lopes has not filed an objection to the report and recommendation within 14 days as required under 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 71.

I find the Report and Recommendation correct, well-reasoned, and thorough, and adopt it in every respect. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 12, 2018

/s/_________

William H. Orrick

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Lopes v. Newsom

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 12, 2018
Case No. 3:17-cv-07369-WHO (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2018)
Case details for

Lopes v. Newsom

Case Details

Full title:CORNELIUS LOPES, Plaintiff, v. GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 12, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-07369-WHO (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2018)