Loper v. English

Full title: JAMES LOPER, Plaintiff, v. D. ENGLISH, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

2:15-cv-1055 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 6, 2015)

Opinion

JAMES LOPER, Plaintiff, v. D. ENGLISH, et al., Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-1055 CKD P United States District Court, E.D. California. October 6, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         By order filed August 20, 2015, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court's order. Plaintiff has consented to this court's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 302.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBYORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).